Every employer wants lower claims. The medical loss ratio does not reward a carrier for delivering them.
The medical loss ratio (MLR) rule requires a large group carrier to spend 85 percent of premium dollars on medical care and quality improvement. A large group carrier keeps 15 percent for administration and profit. If claims fall below 85 percent, the carrier must rebate the difference. That mechanism works. The part employers rarely discuss sits on the other side of the threshold. When claims rise, the 15 percent grows with the premium base.
At 85 percent MLR, the carrier keeps 15 percent of whatever the premium base is. Grow the base and the 15 percent grows. A carrier that trims a low-value claim lowers the employer's spend and also shrinks the base that supports next year's renewal price. On a large group block, claims below 85 percent create a rebate liability. The carrier does not keep that savings. The renewal conversation opens from a smaller claims base, and the allowable admin and profit allowance tightens.
How the 85 Percent Threshold Works Against Cost Control
The employer wants fewer claims. Carriers have no margin incentive to lower claims below the MLR line. A fully insured carrier profits from a claims base that stays at or above the threshold because that base justifies a larger premium next year. A larger premium pool produces a larger admin and profit allowance even at the same MLR.
Cutting claims below the threshold creates a rebate liability and weakens the renewal story. Letting claims run near or above the threshold preserves margin and adds to next year's premium. No carrier conspiracy required. This outcome follows directly from the MLR's fixed margin model.
Rebates Do Not Reverse the Claims Trend
Employer premiums have been rising 5 to 7 percent a year. A rebate refunds margin. It does not reduce the underlying claims trend. A block can earn a rebate one year and still be repriced upward the next because the threshold does not cap claims trend, it only caps margin.
The rebate check gets attention. The renewal increase arrives as a line item. The practical outcome is a carrier with a weak economic reason to prevent low-value care from hitting an employer's claims base and a strong reason to preserve the claims history that supports renewal pricing.
Self-Funding Removes the MLR but Keeps the Unit Price Problem
Self-funded employers do not face the federal MLR rule. They pay claims directly and buy stop-loss coverage. That removes the MLR-based incentive to tolerate higher claims, but it does not remove the unit price problem. Employers still buy networks, stop-loss, and pharmacy contracts from carriers and pharmacy benefit managers. The underlying care still costs too much.
A move from fully insured to self-funded changes who bears the risk. It does not change the volume of low-acuity care flowing into the primary plan.
Change the Claims Base Instead of Fighting the Carrier
The practical target for an employer is high-frequency, low-acuity care:
- Preventive visits and screenings
- Telehealth and virtual urgent care
- Routine labs and diagnostics
- Mental and behavioral health consults
- Prescription support for acute conditions
These encounters generate claim volume. They do not produce the kind of catastrophic risk major medical exists to cover. When they hit the primary plan, they feed the claims base carriers use to set renewal rates. The carrier's admin and profit allowance grows along with the total premium base.
WellthCare™, the first Health-to-Wealth™ Benefit System, is built for exactly this. It works alongside the employer's existing ACA-compliant group health plan and gets used first. Employees pay $0 co-pays for services listed in the plan document, which may include preventive evaluations, telehealth, urgent care, diagnostics, mental and behavioral health, care coordination, and prescription support. Availability varies by plan design.
Because WellthCare is a supplemental benefit system, those first-dollar encounters do not need to become claims on the primary plan, which means the low-acuity volume never feeds the claims base carriers use to set renewal rates. Employees get $0-co-pay care first. They pay less out of pocket. They earn reward dollars at the WellthCare Store™ for verified preventive actions, spendable on FSA-approved products. Employers commit savings to employees' retirement accounts.
Employers get a different result. The MLR problem does not disappear, but the low-acuity volume stops feeding the primary plan's claims base before it becomes a renewal assumption. Carriers have less new claims history to price into the next increase. The employer adds no new out-of-pocket cost and no disruption to the existing plan.
Employers change the conversation. Instead of negotiating with a carrier whose margin model rewards a heavier claims base, the employer strips first-dollar volume out of that base. That shift is arithmetic.
See what a WellthCare Plan would look like for your team.
Healthcare that pays you back.
This article is for general information only and is not legal, tax, or medical advice. Employers should consult their own advisors.